Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (7) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... anisation and came to the conclusion that further interest u/s 244A is not payable. His role was limited to giving effect to the directions of the Tribunal. The question whether the interest is or is not payable was already decided by the Tribunal. Undoubtedly, if the Department had any legal dispute with the decision of the Tribunal, it was always open to the Department to challenge the same in accordance with law. Department has infact exercised such option by first filing an application for rectification before the Tribunal and when such rectification application came to be dismissed, by filing income tax appeal before the High Court. We are informed such appeal is pending. Limited role of the AO was to implement the directions of the Tr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nterest. For the assessment year 1994-95, the question of correct computation of interest payable under section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( the Act for short) on the petitioner s claim of refund reached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( Tribunal for short). The Tribunal by an order dated 16th June, 2017 gave certain directions to the Assessing Officer to compute and pay such interest. Relevant portion of this order reads as under:- 4. Under this issue the contention of the assessee is that the interest u/s.244A of the Act was not properly calculated and refunded in accordance with law settled in by the Hon ble Supreme Court in case titled as CIT Vs. H.E.G. Ltd. 324 ITR 331 and Hon ble Delhi High Court in case titled as India Trade .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o this order of the Tribunal thus, the Assessing Officer was required to pay interest to the petitioner in terms of the law laid down by Supreme Court in case of CIT Vs. H.E.G. Limited 324 ITR 331 and has further followed and expanded by Delhi High Court in case of India Trade Promotion Organisation Vs. CIT 361 ITR 646. 4. The Assessing Officer passed his impugned order pursuant to such directions of the Tribunal. In such order he did not agree with the contention of the assessee that interest as per the said decision of the Delhi High Court in case of India Trade Promotion Organization (supra) was outstanding and payable. He referred to the relevant portion of the judgment of the High Court and presented his understanding of the working of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by Hon ble Delhi High Court. After issue of any part refund, principal part refunded is adjusted against the total principal outstanding and any subsequent interest u/s 244A is computed on the balance principal outstanding. This working also ensures that interest component is not withheld indefinitely and whenever any principal amount is paid the corresponding interest is also paid. 2.6 Accordingly, the above principle was adopted in granting interest to the assessee u/s 244A of the Act of ₹ 283,71,61,850/- in the order passed u/s 154 of the Act dated 23.07.2012 for A.Y. 1994-95 and the assessee is not entitled for any further interest u/s 244A of the Act. 3. Total income of the assessee remains unchanged at ₹ 281,13,70,604/-. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o the petitioner. 7. In the present case, the Tribunal has already examined the question of interest payable to the petitioner under Section 244A of the Act. The decision of the Tribunal lays down certain parameters for payment of such interest. We have reproduced the relevant portion of the order of the Tribunal. As per this order the Assessing Officer was required to compute the interest under section 244A of the Act following the principles laid down by the Delhi High Court in case of India Trade Promotion Organisation (supra). It was not open for the Assessing Officer thereafter to dissect the ratio of the decision of the Delhi High court in case of India Trade Promotion Organisation and came to the conclusion that further interest unde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates