2018 (10) TMI 1707

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e wrong basis assuming incorrectly that a separate notice under section 271AAB was issued, the petitioner cannot argue, in facts of the present case, that the entire proceedings were vitiated. This is so for the reason that admittedly the Assessing Officer, after having initially issued notice under section 271AAA, shortly issued corrigendum correcting the reference to the statutory provision as 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ms Vaibhavi K Parikh(3238) for the Petitioner. Mrs Mauna M Bhatt(174) for the Respondent. ORAL ORDER Mr. Akil Kureshi 1. Appellant-assessee has challenged the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal confirming the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Two grounds are raised before us. F .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sis assuming incorrectly that a separate notice under section 271AAB was issued, the petitioner cannot argue, in facts of the present case, that the entire proceedings were vitiated. This is so for the reason that admittedly the Assessing Officer, after having initially issued notice under section 271AAA, shortly issued corrigendum correcting the reference to the statutory provision as 271AAB. Thi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X