TMI Blog2019 (7) TMI 1412X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ive societies registered under a law in force in the State of Karnataka for registration of co-operative societies. Therefore the conclusion of the revenue authorities that co-operative societies and co-operatives are different and that co-operative registered as Souharda Sahakari cannot be regarded as co-operative societies is unsustainable. We therefore hold that the Assessee should be allowed deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, as the ground on which the same was denied to the Assessee is held to be incorrect. However, the other conditions for allowing deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act needs to be examined by the AO. Therefore, remand the question of allowing deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act to the AO, except the issue a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fferent entities. If the cooperative wants to convert itself into a co-operative society, it has to be converted as per the amended provisions of Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act,1997 as amended by Act 13/2004. Similarly, under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 Co-operative has been defined according to which the co-operative means a co-operative registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997. The AO has made reference to the fact that under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 the word co-operative has been defined in clause 2(e) according to which co-operative means a Co-operative including a co-operative bank doing the business of banking registered or deemed to be registered under section 5 and which has t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 017 order dated 17.8.2018 in which the issue whether souharda registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 can be regarded as co-operative society entitled to benefit of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act was remanded to the AO for fresh consideration. We are of the view that in the present case, the AO and CIT(A) have already considered this issue in the light of the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 and therefore this issue has to be decided by me and cannot be remanded to the AO as was canvassed by the Revenue. 6. I have considered the rival submissions. Sec.2(19) defines cooperative societies for the purpose of the Act and the same is as follows: Definitions. 2. In this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lars of the integrated community development. As time passed by, other aspects were included into the Cooperative act thus heralding the resurgence of a new era in cooperative movement. The state and the central governments were investing millions of rupees in the form of shares, grants, subsidy, contributions, government support, etc., but the expected results couldn t be achieved in cooperative movements. This condition continued almost until early 1980s. 9. Keeping this in mind, the Central Government setup a committee under the Chairmanship of Shri Ardhanarishwaran, which submitted its report in 1987. It attributed the failure of the cooperative movement to the excessive interference of the g ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -operative principles and matters connected therewith; WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for recognition encouragement and voluntary formation of co-operatives based on self-help, mutual aid, wholly owned, managed and controlled by members as accountable, competitive self-reliant and economic enterprises guided by co-operative principles and for matters connected therewith; BE it enacted by the Karnataka State Legislature in the Forty-eighth Year of Republic of India as follows:- 10. The Souharda Cooperatives enjoy functional autonomy in design and implementation of their Business plans, customer service activities, etc., based on the needs of their members. Unlike other forms of cooperatives in India, the interference of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|