Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (8) TMI 647

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Act, 1961 pursuant to the directions of Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel-I, Mumbai [DRP] u/s 144C(5) dated 23/12/2015. The grounds raised by revenue reads as under: - 1. Whether on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble DRP was correct in accepting four comparables namely E4e Healthcare Business Services Limited. Dion Global Solutions Limited and Omega Healthcare Management Services Pvt. Ltd, and Informed Technologies India Limited as a comparables without appreciating the fact that these companies are not similar to the functions performed by the assessee and it is not in accordance with the requirements of degree of comparability as required in Rule 10B(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962? 2. Whether .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble DRP erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer in selecting Accentia Technologies Limited ('Accentia') and Eclerx Services Limited ('Eclerx') as comparables for benchmarking the international transaction of provision of investment/economic/business research services provided by the cross-objector/Respondent to its AE without appreciating that the same are not comparable on the ground of functionality. It is therefore prayed that Accentia and Eclerx be excluded from the final set of comparable companies, since they are functionally not comparable to the cross-objector/Respondent. 3. Without Prejudice to the above Grounds, on the fa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed service revenue of Rs. 20.09 Crores from its AE and in its Transfer Pricing Study Report, benchmarked the transactions using Transactional Net Margin Method [TNMM] with Profit Level Indicator being Operating Profit/Operating Cost. It arrived at margin of 18.18% as against mean margin of 3.97% reflected by 15 entities. However, treating the functions of assessee as KPO, Ld. TPO rejected the search adopted by assessee using the key words as 'BPO/ITES'. Finding more fallacies/shortcoming in assessee's methodology, the comparable entities were rejected. In the final analysis, adopting 2 entities namely Accentia Technologies Ltd. & Eclerx Services Ltd. having mean margin of 43%, Ld. TPO revised assessee's margin to 16.60% and proposed TP adju .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , noted that the assessee did not follow any structured search procedures to identity the comparable and data used was not made available to Ld. TPO. 3.3 Proceeding further, although Ld. DRP upheld the action of Ld. TPO in selecting 2 comparable entities viz. Accentia Technologies Ltd. & Eclerx Services Ltd., however, at the same time, Ld. DRP agreed with assessee's submissions for inclusion of 4 entities namely (i) Dion Global Solutions Ltd. (ii) E4 Healthcare Business Services Ltd. (iii) Omega Healthcare Management Services Pvt. Ltd. & (iv) Informed Technologies India Ltd. Aggrieved by the inclusion of 4 entities, the revenue is in further appeal before us. 3.4 Before Ld. DRP, the assessee has alternatively argued that total TP adjustm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er consideration also. 5. The Ld. Authorized Representative for Assessee [AR] has drawn our attention to the orders of Ld. TPO in subsequent years to submit that a particular methodology has been accepted by the assessee as well as revenue to work out the TP adjustment and therefore, the same methodology should be applied in this year also, facts being pari-materia the same. 6. Upon due consideration, we find force in the arguments advanced by Ld. AR. The perusal of paras 10.3 & 10.4 of order of Ld. TPO for AY 2012- 13, as placed on record, would reveal that revised margins of USA & UK AEs have been accepted to be 1.05% & 1.71% respectively and the assessee has agreed for TP adjustment of Rs. 81 Lacs after considering 1% profit retention .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates