9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 1025X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER(TECHNICAL) Shri Sivarajan, Consultant for the Appellant Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER PER : SULEKHA BEEVI C.S The above appeals have been filed by the appellants aggrieved by the rejection of refund claims filed under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No.27/2012 (CE-NT). 2. On behalf of the appellants, Ld. Consult ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ices, the relevant date for computing the period of one year is the date of realization of foreign exchange. In all these appeals, when the period of computation is reckoned from the date of receiving foreign exchange, the refund claims are well within time. He also relies upon the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CENZA Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs CST Chennai - 2017 (4) G ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... computation of relevant date in the case of export of goods. In the present case, the issue is with regard to computation of the period of limitation in case of export of services. The said issue stands settled by the Tribunal's Larger Bench decision in the case of Span Infotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Following the said decision, we are of the considered view that rejection of refund claims o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
