9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 325X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lok Sharma h/f. Indani Radheshyam S. Advocate for Respondents/UOI: Mr. Deshpande Sanjeev B. Advocate for Respondents: Mr. Ladda Dwarkadas S. for R/2 & 3 P.C. : Mr. Sharma the learned counsel submits that though the petitioner is challenging the order in original passed in the year 2012 in OIO No. 91/S.T./A.C./2012 the copy of the said order is not available to the petitioner. The same w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in original by speed post, however at present the acknowledgment is not traceable. According to the learned counsel, the order in original is passed after considering the say put-forth by the petitioner. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner has a remedy of appeal. 3. We cannot set aside any order without the copy of the said order before us. In fact the Registry should not have regist ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be issued to the petitioner within 15 days from today. 6. Upon receipt of the certified copy the petitioner may file an appeal against the said order if so advised before the appropriate forum. The appropriate forum shall naturally consider about the claim of the petitioner that the order in original was not served upon the petitioner and thereafter shall pass the necessary orders. 7. The learne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
