Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (10) TMI 254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ff the appeal. On the Revenue preferring appeal against the order of the Tribunal, the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court has restored the matter by observing that the Tribunal did not advert to various aspects on factual matrices which resulted in rejection of application by the Commissioner on merits. It is pursuant to such restoration that the instant proceedings have taken place. 3. The factual panorama is that the assessee filed application u/s.80G of the Act in the prescribed form on 26-02-2009. The ld. CIT on first page of the impugned order held that he ought to have passed the order within a period of six months from the date of application. However, noting that the delay was caused by the assessee, it was opined that his order, having .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 28-03-2010, the Tribunal held that the same was "beyond the prescribed period under Rule 11AA of the I.T. Rules and as such the certificate u/s.80G(5) is deemed to have been granted to the assessee". 6. Then from para 16 onwards, the Tribunal dealt with the issue on merits and held that the CIT ought to have granted registration to the assessee u/s.80G thereby allowing the assessee's appeal. 7. The Revenue approached the Hon'ble High Court raising the following questions of law, which were admitted on 10-12- 2012: "1. Whether the Tribunal is correct in Law and Facts, holding that the respondent assessee society's action in maintaining separate account in respect of vernacular project without brining into society's account which is manda .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd violations which indicate not only the Chairman and Secretary but also the respondent assessee has violated in discharging its duties and as such the decision relied upon by the Tribunal is not applicable to the facts of the case?. 8. The Hon'ble High Court, vide its judgment dated 23.7.2015, considered the questions raised before it and then restored the matter for fresh consideration. Since the questions raised and admitted by the Hon'ble High Court were only on merits and not on the time limitation, which issue was otherwise decided by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee, the Hon'ble High Court had no occasion to deal with such issue. 9. Section 80G deals with grant of recognition. Rule 11AA contains requirements for approval of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rom the date on which the application was made. In case the order refusing or granting approval is not passed within a period of six months, then the moot question arises as to whether the passing of order belatedly would be considered as valid. 11. In the context of section 12AA wherein again there is a requirement for grant of approval u/s.12A within a period of six months, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT and Another Vs. Society for the Promotion of Education (2016) 382 ITR 6 (SC) has held that once application for registration u/s.12AA was made and in case the same was not responded to within six months, it would be taken that the application was registered under the provision and hence registration/application would take effect accord .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tribunal has held that the certificate u/s. 80G(5) was deemed to have been granted on the expiry of period of six months from the date on which application was filed coupled with period of delay of 19 days attributable to the assessee, naturally the assessee gets entitled to registration u/s.80G without considering the merits as discussed by the ld. CIT in his order passed beyond the stipulated period. We, therefore, hold that the order passed by the Tribunal granting deemed registration u/s. 80G(5) sans merits, still holds the field. 14. The ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed a Review Petition before the Hon'ble High Court on this very issue of deemed registration, which is still pending. In this regard, it is held that if in a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates