TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 58X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on Call for Appellant Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Superintendent, (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa On matter being called neither anybody appeared nor is there any adjournment request. Accordingly, we have heard learned A.R. and have gone through the impugned order. 2. Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the appeal by observing that the order impugned before him was dispatched on 3 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur reported at 2008 (221) E.L.T. 163 (S.C.)
4. Inasmuch as admittedly there was a delay of one month and 20 days in filing the appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) has rightly rejected the same as barred by limitation. Accordingly, the impugned order is upheld and the present appeal is rejected.
(Pronounced & Dictated in Court) X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|