9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 735X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Adv. For respondent no. 1 Mr. Amit Bansal, Sr. Standing with Mr. Aman Rewaria and Ms. Annu Singh, Advs. for respondent no. 2 O R D E R D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been preferred challenging the order passed by the Revisional Authority of the respondents dated 6th August, 2018 (Annexure P-1 to the memo of this writ petition). The revision was preferred by the peti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er of Central Excise v. Glyph International Ltd., 2014 (35) STR 30 (Allahabad) that, no court fee to be paid by the petitioner in Revision Application. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the present case, as well, an application was preferred by the petitioner for a drawback claims, the same was not allowed by the respondent, and the impugned order was passed on 19th Ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Revision Application was preferred on 14th June, 2016. Hence, original applicant has preferred the present writ petition challenging the order passed by the Revisional Authority dated 6th August, 2018 (Annexure P-1) dismissing the revision application. 4. Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that petitioner is claiming a drawb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ter has not been appreciated by the Revisional Authority while deciding the Revision Application as stated hereinabove. 5. We therefore quash and set aside the order passed by the Revisional Authority dated 6th August, 2018 (Annexure P-1 to the memo of this writ petition). Revision Application is revived at its original number and the same will be decided by the Revisional Authority on its own me ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
