Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (11) TMI 928

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re as he has confirmed the order of Ld. AO who made additions u/s 14A in the total income of the assessee company. 2. That addition u/s 14A of the Act was made by making disallowance of Rs. 7,10,476/- against the total expenditure of Rs. 8,69,681/- which is quite unjustified and is bad in law. 3. That the learned CIT(A) has erred in law by affirming the disallowance made by AO amounting to Rs. 7,10,476/- over and above the disallowance already made by the assessee company under section 14A of the Act, ignoring the basic fact that no expenses had been incurred for earning exempt income. [A.1] The assessee also filed an additional grounds of appeal during appellate proceedings in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which are as under:- 1. Wh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as a result of aforesaid disallowance of Rs. 7,10,476/- made by the Assessing Officer and pleaded that this was not just. The assessee also relied on several decided precedents during appellate proceedings before the learned CIT(A), which included the following decisions:- 1. Wimco Seedings Ltd. Vs. DCIT. 107 ITD 267 (Del) 2. Impulse (India) (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT, 22 SOT 368(Del). 3. Maruti Udyog Ltd. vs. DCIT, 92 ITD 119 (Del). 4. CIT vs. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. 326 ITR 1 (SC). 5. CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. [195] 19 ITR 191. 6. Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. vs. CIT [1982] 136 ITR 361. 7. The Printers House Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No. 227/2009 dated 16.04.2009. 8. CIT vs. Hindustan Tin Works Limited in ITA No. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s does not come into operation automatically. She further submitted that Rule 8D is triggered only when the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with correctness of the assessee's claim on account of suo moto disallowance made by the assessee under section 14A. She further submitted that the Assessing Officer has not expressed, in speaking manner, the reasons in detail for his dissatisfaction with correctness of the claim of the assessee regarding suo moto disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tact Act. In view of these facts, she contended that the further disallowance of aforesaid Rs. 7,10,476/-. For this purpose, the learned counsel for the assessee relied on order of Coordinate Bench of ITAT Delhi in the case of Azimuth Investments .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e under section 14A of I.T. Act, in speaking manner. He has also not given detailed reasons, in a speaking manner, why he is not satisfied with the correctness of the assessee's claim in respect of suo moto disallowance made by the assessee under section 14A of Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer has merely stated in a cryptic summary and non speaking manner that the... disallowance worked out of assessee at Rs. 1,59,205/- "...is not as per provisions on Rule 8D and is therefore not correct." He seems to be of the view that if the disallowance suo moto made by the assessee is not in accordance with Rule 8D of I.T. Rules, then it is not correct. However, this view is erroneous, when we peruse section 14A(2) of I.T. Act. The Assessing Offic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... total income under this Act." 8. A bare reading of the aforementioned provision makes it clear that the satisfaction is to be recorded by assessing officer and by no other authority. Under section 251 Ld. CIT(A) in an appeal against an order of assessment is empowered to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment but if the assessment order suffers from jurisdictional errors then Ld. CIT(A) has no power to correct such jurisdictional errors. The coterminous powers vested in CIT(A) does not imply that he can clothe himself with powers to correct the jurisdictional defects in the assessment order. It is well settled law that where the very initiation of assessment proceedings by the AO was invalid then Ld. CIT(A) cannot direct for ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates