TMI Blog2014 (2) TMI 1371X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... matter be placed on 21.02.2014 so that on that day, the materials which had been collected against the petitioner would be produced - Till then, interim order passed on 20.09.2013 shall continue. - Cr. M. P. No. 2651 of 2013 - - - Dated:- 12-2-2014 - Mr. R. R. Prasad, J. For the Petitioner(s): M/s Anil Kumar J. S. Tiwary, Advocates. For the CBI: Md. Mokhtar Khan, ASGI. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... wo companies and also Nandlal HUF to give and take loan, the petitioner cannot be said to have abetted Dr. Pradeep Kumar in any manner, in view of the decision rendered in a case of Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad Vs. K. Narayana Rao {[2012] 9 Supreme Court Cases 512] and, therefore, the prosecution of this petitioner under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|