Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (3) TMI 1837

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ions filed before the CIT(A), no grievance in this regard was raised by the assessee. CIT(A) has duly taken into consideration the break-up of the operating expenses. No merit therein, the grievance sought to be raised by the assessee by way of ground no.1, ground no.1 is rejected.
SHRI A. D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For the Appellant : Shri R. K. Agarwal, & Shri Rahul Agarwal, Advocates. For the Respondent : Shri Waseem Arshad, Sr. DR. ORDER PER, A. D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This is assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14, raising the following grouds: "1. Because, on the facts and circumstances, Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), hereinafter referred to as "Ld. CIT(A)" was no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... osed for your kind consideration. Since the Assessee could not present evidences/details for operating exps. at the time of hearing due to a reasonable cause of medical unfitness, so these evidences/details should be allowed as per the Rule 46A and on the ground of principal of natural justice. 2). The AO has further added ₹ 1,90,000/- of cash deposited Bank Account. This deposit represent receipt from withdrawal from same bank account as well as receipt from Teaching activity, which is already disclosed by the assessee in the ITR." 4. The ld. CIT(A) forwarded these written submissions to the AO and asked for a remand report. The AO submitted the remand report, to which, no rejoinder was filed. The ld. CIT(A) admitted the additio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ns of section 57(iii) because adequate evidences-for the same have not been provided by the appellant and also because the nexus between these expenses and the income from other sources declared by the appellant in the return of income, has not been proved by him. I also hold that the other two additions of ₹ 1,50,000/- by treating the declared agricultural income as income from other sources, and that of ₹ 1,90,600/-, being cash deposited in the appellant's bank account, are correctly made by the A.O. Ground no. 2, 3 and 4 are accordingly dismissed." 5. Before this Bench, the assessee has filed by way of additional evidences, salary Certificates from his employees. These Certificates, however, are dated 27.09.2017, i.e., .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates