9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 96X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e conditions for sanctioning a scheme under Section 18 of the said Act being the same as those required for a declaration under Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, the BIFR could not have sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation of Sharp Edge with the appellant but declined to make the declaration under Section 72A o f the Income Tax Act with regard to t hat amalgamation' (underlining for emphasis, ours) Nothing further remains to be said in the light of the categoric conclusion of the Supreme Court emphasised above. The view taken by the Assessing Authority to the effect that the claim of the assessee is liable to be allowed in the light of the provisions of section 32(2) of the SICA and its interpretation by the Supreme Court is thus, the correct one. Jurisdiction exercised by the CIT to correct the alleged error in assessment was in terms of section 263 of the Act. Section 263 empowers the Commissioner of Income tax to revise an order of assessment if the order in question is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, both conditions to be satisfied concurrently. The action of the assessing officer, though prejudicial, can hardly be termed as erroneous ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the issue of additional depreciation on Wind Mill and consequently the direction given by the Commissioner of Income-tax on this issue is void on account of lack of jurisdiction, even though the assessee furnishing his reply to show cause notice, has included in respect of additional depreciation on Wind Mills? and 3.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to additional depreciation on the purchase of Wind Mills under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 even though the main business of the assessee is not producing or generating of electricity? 2.Both the learned counsels fairly submitted that both the issues viz., powers under Section 263 of the Act and additional depreciation of the Wind Mill are now covered by two separate judgments of this Court against the Revenue. In the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax-II Vs. Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd., Coimbatore [in T.C.A.No.747 of 2009 dated 13.02.2019] wherein a Coordinate Bench of this Court (in which one of us, Dr.Vineet Kothari, J. was a Member] held as under: 13. The provisions ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es by providing incentives and removing impediments in the way of such amalgamation which would not merely relieve the Government of uneconomical burden of taking over and running sick units but save the Government from social costs in terms of loss of production and unemployment. With such objective in view, in order to facilitate the merger of sick industrial units with sound ones and as and by way of offering an incentive in that behalf s. 72A was introduced in the Act where under by a deeming fiction the accumulated loss or unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating company is treated to be a loss or, as the case may be, allowance for depreciation of the amalgamated company in the previous year in which the amalgamation was effected; but the amalgamated company, although a successor in interest, would be entitled to carry forward and set-off the accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating company only where the amalgamating company was not, immediately before such amalgamation, financially viable and the amalgamation was in public interest. The expression financial nonviability had not been defined in the Act but the Finance Minister's speech, the no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t the amalgamating company was not, immediately before the amalgamation, financially viable by reason of its liabilities, losses and other relevant factors, and that the amalgamation was in the public interest, By reason of Section 32(2) of the said Act, where there has been under any scheme thereunder an amalgamation of a sick industrial company with another company, the provisions of Section 72A of the Income Tax Act shall apply in relation to such amalgamation, subject to this modification that the power of the Central Government is to be exercised by the BIFR without the necessity of a recommendation by the specified authority mentioned in Section 72A of the Income Tax Act. This is because, for the purposes of according sanction to a scheme of amalgamation of a sick industrial undertaking with any other company under Section 18 of the said Act, the BIFR has to be satisfied that the amalgamating company is not financially viable, which is the effect of Section 3(o) of the said Act, and that the amalgamation is necessary or expedient in the public interest, which is the effect of Sections 17 and 18 of the said Act read together. Sanction of a scheme of amalgamation under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... id not deal the issue, which is at hand. 7.2.The issue, in hand, is as to whether balance additional depreciation could be carried forward to the year, following the previous year, in which, additional depreciation was claimed. 7.3.The Division Bench in M.M.Forgings case the said case was not concerned with the issue, with which, we are faced, that is, the right to carry forward the balance additional depreciation. Therefore, the judgment is completely distinguishable. 8.The second submission of Mr.Ravi, that Circular no.8 of 2002 dated 27.08.2002 and Circular no.281 dated 29.11.1979, have not been taken note of, in our judgment rendered in Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai Vs. M/s.Shri T.P.Textiles Private Limited, according to us, will not impact, either the reasoning or the conclusion reached by us, in the said matter. 8.1.It is pertinent to note that the Circular no.281 dated 29.11.1979, pre-dates the insertion of the relevant provision, i.e., second clause to Section 32 (1) (iia). The said clause (iia), admittedly, was inserted by virtue of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2002, with effect from 01.04.2003. 8.2.In so far as the second Circular is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
