TMI Blog2020 (3) TMI 435X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 019 (9) TMI 1331 - MADRAS HIGH COURT ] where the refund was allowed. Petition allowed. - W.P. No. 37472 of 2016 And W.M.P.Nos.32078 to 32080 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 24-1-2020 - Mr. Justice C. Saravanan For the Petitioner : Mr.V.Shanthanam For the Respondents : Mr. S.Rajasekar Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the office of Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n Order The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions challenge notices/order-in-original/appellate orders proposing to reject/rejecting the request for refund of special additional duty. 2. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondents fairly points out that the issue of refund of special additional duty was considered by the Customs, Central Excis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|