9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (3) TMI 505X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arned standing counsel revenue for the appellant and Mr. S.C. Tiwari alongwith Ms. Rutuja Pawar for the respondent / assessee. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) against the order dated 10.01.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "C" Bench, Mumbai ("Tribunal" for short) in Income Tax Appeal No. 1958 /Mu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1961 by ignoring the fact that the Assessing Officer in his order has pointed out that the assessee runs a pharmacy store in its hospital for profit motive and without appreciating the fact that the assessee's turnover from the Pharmacy store is substantial as compared to the gross receipts and so it cannot be said to incidental to attainment of main objective ? 3. Whether on the facts and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (Bom)] decided on the issue of applicability of Section 10(23C) (via) and the twin conditions specified in sec. 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act which include rejection of maintaining separate books of account were not be issue involved ? 5. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified in allowing the claim of the assessee for exemption under Section 11 o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f 2017 (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) vs. National Health and Education Society), a copy of which has been placed before us. 5. We have perused the order dated 05.02.2020 passed by this Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-(Exemption), Mumbai v/s. National Health and Education Society and we find that the proposed questions have been answered by this Court in favour of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
