2020 (3) TMI 530

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 76-87280/2019
Customs
HON'BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND HON'BLE MR. P. ANJANI KUMAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri Prashant Patankar, Consultant for the Appellant Shri Manoj Kumar, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty Brief facts of the case are that the appellant herein, M/s Turakhia Ferromet Pvt. Ltd. had imported a consignment of 1999.194 MTs .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... was confirmed along with interest and penalties were imposed on the appellants under Section 114A and 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. On appeal against the said adjudication order, the learned Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai has partially modified the said order and disposed of the appeals filed by the appellants. Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order, the appellants have preferred .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Order No. A/91475/2017 dated 11.12.2017 passed by the Tribunal in the case of V.K. Industrial Corporation Ltd., to state that under identical situation, imposition of penalty was set aside. 3. On the other hand, the learned AR appearing for Revenue reiterates the findings recorded in the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records. 5. We find that in the case of M/s V.K. Indust .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X