2017 (7) TMI 1353

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the balance of convenience and inconvenience lies in favour of the petitioner, the bank will not take any step against the petitioner under the Act of 2002 in any manner whatsoever until further orders of this Court. - W.P. No. 33799(W) of 2014 - - - Dated:- 24-7-2017 - Debangsu Basak, J. Mr. Sudip Sanyal, Mr. Jayanta Kumar Sanyal, Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta Mr. Anath Nath Naskar Mr. Firdous .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... estrained from taking further steps. Learned advocate appearing for the co-operative bank relies upon an unreported decision of this Court rendered in WP 26885(W) of 2015 (Smt. Anjana Vs. The A.P. Vardhaman (Mahila) Co-operative Urban Bank Limited Ors.) as also an unreported Division Bench Judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rendered in W.P. 7769 of 2015 (Mr. Inder Raj Agarwal Vs. Union .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s made out a prima facie case and the balance of convenience and inconvenience lies in favour of the petitioner, the bank will not take any step against the petitioner under the Act of 2002 in any manner whatsoever until further orders of this Court. At this stage, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, the bank has already taken actual physical possession of the property. The bank .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X