9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (4) TMI 809X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') but under Section 35L of the Act as the basic question for determination relates to taxability or excisability of goods. 3. Both the said Sections of the Act are reproduced herein below:- "Section 35G. Appeal to High Court. - (1) An appeal shall lie to the High Court from every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal on or after the 1st day of July, 2003 (not being an order relating, among other things, to the determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for purposes of assessment), if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law. (2) The Princi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... such question. (5) The High Court shall decide the question of law so formulated and deliver such judgment thereon containing the grounds on which such decision is founded and may award such cost as it deems fit. (6) The High Court may determine any issue which - (a) has not been determined by the Appellate Tribunal; or (b) has been wrongly determined by the Appellate Tribunal, by reason of a decision on such question of law as is referred to in sub-Section (1). (7) When an appeal has been filed before the High Court, it shall be heard by a bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court, and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority, if any, of such Judges. (8) Where there is n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion to the rate of duty shall include the determination of taxability or excisability of goods for the purpose of assessment." 4. That from Section 35L(1) (b) of the Act it is evident that the appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court on the question in relation to rate of duty of excise or value of goods. Sub-Section(2) of Section 35L of the Act clarifies that the rate of duty shall include the determination of taxability or excisability of goods. In the present case, the issue involved is as to whether the activity of the appellant falls within the definition of Section 65 (19) of the Finance Act, 1994 and thereby whether the cost of activity would form part and parcel of the charge levied by the Revenue. 5. In our considered opinion, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
