9911796707
TMI Blog1991 (1) TMI 39X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he firm, Babulal Motilal (Execution Case No. 74 of 1953 in O. S. No. 254 of 1952, Smt. Sarbati Devi v. Baboo Lal Moti Lal, on the file of the learned Civil Judge, Aligarh). The petitioner says that the auction was held on April 29, 1956, and confirmed on May 29, 1956. He says that a sale certificate has been issued to him and that he was put in possession and that thereafter he substantially impro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stated that the property was attached under the Income-tax Act for recovery of arrears due from the firm. It is, therefore, submitted that the house continues to be liable for the said arrears. It is further stated that, on December 14, 1988, the house was again attached. In the counter-affidavit, it is not denied that the petitioner did file objections to the attachment/sale on December 28, 1988. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any opinion on the several factual and legal contentions urged by both the sides. It is sufficient to direct that the Tax Recovery Officer shall proceed to investigate and adjudicate upon the objections filed by the petitioner on December 28, 1988 (annexure III to the writ petition) in accordance with law. The further steps to be taken against the said house shall depend upon the result of such in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
