2020 (6) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned Standing Counsels appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that the remedy available to the petitioner as against recovery proceedings is only before the competent jurisdictional authorities of Karnataka State and hence, the petitioner may be given reasonable time to approach the authorities concerned for appropriate remedy - HELD THAT:- The petition is disposed off with the direction th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this Court through Video Conferencing, CISCO Webex Meeting, on account of COVID-19. 2. According to the petitioner, they are the manufacturer of corrugated carton boxes at their factory at Doddaballapur in Bangalore. They clears the carton boxes manufactured by them to variety of customers, besides supplying the same to SEZ Units, which are deemed exports as specified under Chapter 8 of the For .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nce of the EODC. Finding no response on the said communications, the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a mandamus forbearing the 2nd respondent from making payment against the said bank Guarantee. 3. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsels appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that the remedy available to the petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X