TMI Blog2020 (7) TMI 104X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... against the impugned order dated 24.01.2020 bearing reference in GSTIN. 33AXLPA4540R1Z8/17-18, the respondent has now passed another order dated 24.06.2020 bearing reference in TIN.3397566000/17-18. By the said order dated 24.06.2020, the respondent has recognized that the petitioner is entitled for a refund of excess amount of Rs. 13,38,958/-, which was sought to be denied vide the impugned orde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d to the petitioner. The petitioner had also adjusted the same from transitional credit availed by the petitioner towards its tax liability. 5.Therefore, question of payment of interest by the petitioner under Section 50 of the said Act, does not arise as the said amount is sought to be refunded. The writ petition is therefore liable to be closed in the light of the subsequent order dated 24.06.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|