1993 (4) TMI 330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es punishable inter alia under Section 5(2)(i)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In addition thereto, a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against the respondent and a charge-sheet dated February 7, 1990 was issued. The respondent was also placed under suspension by order dated May 10, 1990. The respondent challenged the suspension order and the charge-sheet before the State Administrativ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... proceedings, did not arise for consideration or adjudication by the Tribunal at this stage. This being so, the Tribunal's order quashing the charge-sheet as well, on reaching the conclusion that the suspension order had to be set aside, is unwarranted. The respondent had been under suspension for nearly two years on the date of the Tribunal's order and another year has elapsed since then. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X