9911796707
TMI Blog1990 (12) TMI 60X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the following two questions for the opinion of this court : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that two assessments should be made separately for the two periods, April 1, 1971, to October 31, 1971, and November 1, 1971, to March 31, 1972 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... continuation were filed. The Income-tax Officer was of the opinion that it was a case of mere reconstitution of firm and, accordingly, made one assessment for the entire year. He also did not accept the return relating to the income, he enhanced it. On appeal, a contention was raised by the assessee that two separate assessments should have to be made for the two separate periods, one for the pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rson in the firm. On the same day, the said sole surviving partner took two other persons as partners. The question is whether it is a case of reconstitution within the meaning of section 187 of the Income-tax Act or a case of succession within the meaning of section 188. If the Partnership Act alone is taken into account, there may be something to be said in favour of the view taken by the Tribun ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... se to be partners or one or more new partners are admitted, in such circumstances that one or more of the persons who were partners of the firm before the change continue as partner or partners after the change, it shall be treated as reconstitution. In similar circumstances, we have held that it was a case of reconstitution, vide our judgment in I. T. R. No. 1095 of 1978, CIT v. Jagjiwan Patel Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
