9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (8) TMI 214X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... today - After the aforesaid amount will be deposited by the revisionist, concerned court below is directed that the appeal may be heard on merits and may be decided, in accordance with law, by means of reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months from the date of first hearing of appeal. Application disposed off. - CRIMINAL REVISION No. 4961 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 29-1-2020 - Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan , J. For the Revisionist : Manish Dev Singh,Syed Aqil Abbas For the Opposite Party : G. A. ORDER Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Sri Diwan Saifullah Khan, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 in Court today is taken on record. Heard learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gment and order dated 22.06.2018, revisionist filed criminal appeal which was admitted on 30.10.2018 and he was directed to deposit forty per cent of the fine amount within a period of 10 days and was further directed to release the revisionist on personal bond of two sureties of ₹ 2,00,000/-. The appeal was dismissed vide order dated 11.03.2019 on account of non-deposition of the said amount as directed by the order dated 30.10.2018. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the revisionist that as per Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in an appeal by the drawer against conviction under Section 138, the Appellate Court may order the revisionist to deposit such sum amount which shall be a minimum of twenty per ce ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... orders by which the revisionist has directed to deposit forty per cent of the fine amount, but still he has not deposited the same. In spite of availing all these orders, revisionist has filed this criminal revision on the ground that appeal cannot be rendered infructuous on account of non-deposition of the final amount. Perusal of the provisions of Section 148 N.I. Act as well as the fact that the revisionist has approached this Court by means of filing several applications in which also he was given sufficient time to deposit the penalty amount still the same has not been complied by the revisionist. In view of the facts and circumstances stated above, revisionist is directed to deposit 50 per cent of the fine amount, preferably, wi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
