TMI Blog2020 (8) TMI 298X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rts of sewing machine - petitioner pays a sum of ₹ 2 lakhs and also furnishing a bank guarantee to the extent of ₹ 1.80 lakhs - HELD THAT:- The issue as to whether the writ petition could be maintained or not does not require consideration at this stage, since the respondents have chosen to proceed with the demand of the differential duty and the second respondent had also issued a sho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ioner : Mr. A.K. Jayaraj For Respondents : Mr. A.P. Srinivas, SC for R1 Mr. Velayutham Pichai, SPC for R2 and R3 O R D E R Today, the matter is called through video conferencing. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved against the Mahazar dated 01.07.2014, whereby certain goods relating to parts of sew ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the petitioner, there were no further proceedings after the receipt of the reply. 5. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the writ petition challenging the Mahazar is not maintainable and therefore seeks for dismissal of the writ petition. 6. The issue as to whether the writ petition could be maintained or not does not require consideration at ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|