Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (9) TMI 8

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) in the Port area for providing services of loading and unloading etc. with the help of the crane have collected licence fee from the crane operators. The process of dispute is September, 2006 to September, 2008. 2. The appellant is a statutory body, a Port Trust, operating the major Port at Mangalore. They are registered with the Service Tax Department. Under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963, under which the appellant is constituted and governed under Section 35 (2) (c) of the said Act and they are required to provide/execute such works within or without the limit of the Port, and provide such appliances that is necessary or expedient inter alia moorings and cranes, scales and other necessary means and appliances for loading and unloading .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... facility by crane to the service receivers viz. importer, exporters, etc. 3. It appeared to Revenue that this activity of the appellant- granting of license to operate the crane in the Port area to the licensee, such license fee is chargeable to Service Tax under the Head "Franchise Services". Accordingly, SCN dated 3rd April, 2009 was issued invoking the extended period of limitation. The SCN was adjudicated on contest vide OIO dated 23rd July, 2009, confirming the demand of Rs. 68,03,388/- along with equal amount of penalty under Section 78 and further penalty was imposed under Section 76 & 77 read with Rule 7(c). Being aggrieved by the impugned order, the appellant is before this Tribunal. 4. Learned Counsel urges that for any service .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Revenue relied upon the impugned order. 7. Considering the rival submission and on perusal of the impugned order, we hold that the issue is no longer res integra and the same has been decided in favour of the assessee by Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of Cochin Port Trust (supra):- "7. The amounts paid by IGTPL to CPT is only in respect of the right conferred on the IGTPL to carry out the port services; for provision of which the users of the port would pay a fee. In such circumstances, definitely the Revenue earned by IGTPL will be taxed under the Finance Act, 1994 specifically under sub-clause (lxxxii) of Section 65. It is a percentage of that, which the IGTPL pays to CPT, in lieu of surrendering their rights to carry ou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates