TMI Blog2019 (7) TMI 1693X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court[ 2014 (1) TMI 1183 - ITAT MUMBAI ] in the preceding assessment years we hold that the disallowance under section 14A r/w rule 8D, should be restricted to the amount already disallowed by the assessee under section 14A. - Decided in favour of assessee. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... essing Officer did not find merit in the submissions of the assessee and proceeded to compute disallowance under rule 8D(2) at ₹ 3,57,95,064. After adjusting the disallowance already made by the assessee, the Assessing Officer added back an amount of ₹ 3,55,92,376. Being aggrieved with the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer, the assessee preferred appeal before the first appellate authority. 5. The learned Commissioner (Appeals), after considering the submissions of the assessee, granted partial relief to the assessee by restricting the disallowance to ₹ 5,34,326. 6. Shri Madhur Agarwal, learned Counsel for the assessee submitted, the total expenditure debited to the Profit & Loss account for the year under consi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... observations of the Assessing Officer. 8. We have considered rival submissions and perused the material on record. Though there is no dispute that during the year under consideration, the assessee had earned both taxable as well as exempt income, however, fact remains, the total expenditure claimed by the assessee in respect of all sources income earned during the year is ₹ 6.71 lakh. Even out of the said amount, the assessee has further disallowed ₹ 2,02,688, under section 14A, towards earning of exempt income. The aforesaid disallowance was made by the assessee on proportionate basis keeping in view the quantum of taxable income and exempt income earned during the year. It is also evident, assessee had been following the afo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|