2020 (11) TMI 233

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3. Ms. Mansie Jain and Mr. Chandratanay Chaube, Advocates for respondent no.6. J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed primarily challenging the final order dated 11th May, 2020 passed by National Anti-profiteering Authority (hereinafter referred .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sie Jain, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.6. 6. Mr.Ravi Prakash, on instructions, admits that there are some factual mistakes in the impugned order and he has no objection if the impugned order dated 11th May, 2020 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to NAPA for fresh adjudication. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the same. 8. Consequently, w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X