9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (12) TMI 1844X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... P GOSAIN, JM: 1. This appeal by Assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-3, Mumbai dated 28.04.2017 for the A.Y 2014-15,which in itself directed against the order passed by the Assessing Officer (for short A.O) under Sec. 143(3)of the IT Act, 1961. 2. At the very outset, we noticed that the Ld. CIT(A) had decided the grounds raised by the assessee by following the order of coordinate ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the Tribunal that the assessee has been extending incentives to employees for the proceeding years and the subsequent years also and the same is accepted by the Revenue. The Tribunal has also relied on the Judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Maina Ore Transport P. Ltd, reported in 324 ITR 100 and shahzada Nand and sons Vs. CIT, reported in 108 ITR 358, where it has been held that ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the matter is squarely covered by the decision of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT in assessee's own case, which was also upheld by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. New India Co-op. Bank Ltd., in Income Tax Appeal No. 371 of 2015 (supra), therefore respectfully following the same, we decide the issue in favour of assessee. 4. In the net result, the appeal filed by the Revenue ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
