2020 (11) TMI 722

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ourt does not express any view on the correctness or otherwise on the merits of the controversy involved in the matter- Petition dismissed. - W.P. Nos. 11124 and 11125 of 2016 And W.M.P. Nos. 9665 and 9666 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 5-11-2020 - THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU For Petitioner : Mr. V.S.Manoj (in both WPs) For Respondent : Mr. A.N.R.Jayaprathab Government Advoc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6, as mentioned therein. However, the Petitioner did not prefer any such appeal before that Appellate Authority, but has instead filed these Writ Petitions on 23.03.2016 challenging the order passed by the Respondent. 3. There is no acceptable explanation from the Petitioner for not having resorted to that alternative remedy provided under the statute. In this context, it must be recapitulated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ass the alternative remedy provided by statute. Surely matters involving the revenue where statutory remedies are available are not such matters. We can also take judicial notice of the fact that the vast majority of the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are filed solely for the purpose of obtaining interim orders and thereafter prolong the proceedings by one device or the other. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X