9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (11) TMI 923X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt Advocate ORDER Heard Mr. V.Srikanth, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs. G.Dhana Madhri, Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondent and perused the materials placed on record and apart from the pleadings of the parties. 2. It is apparent from the materials placed on record that a deemed assessment was made in respect of the Petitioner for the year 2010-2011 under the Ta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ions for the proposal made in the notice sent by the Respondent. The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the said order mainly on the ground that the replies sent by the Petitioner have not been taken into account. 4. The receipt of the replies dated 07.09.2013 and 17.09.2013 sent by the Petitioner in response to the notice dated 30.08.2013 issued by the Respondent has not been rebutted. As ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sonal hearing to the Petitioner, to deal with each of the contentions raised by the Petitioner and pass reasoned orders on merits and in accordance with law following the prescribed procedure in consonance with the principles of natural justice and communicate the decision taken to the Petitioner under written acknowledgment. 7. The Writ Petition is ordered on the aforesaid terms. Consequently, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
