9911796707
TMI Blog1989 (3) TMI 97X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to it a capital asset owned by him, does it amount to a transfer of the asset and if so, does the credit given for it in the books of the firm attract capital gains tax if such credit exceeds the price at which it had been acquired by the partner ? Herein lies the matter in issue in this reference. On August 25, 1972, the assessee, Ved Parkash, purchased a plot of land for Rs. 49,250. Later, on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... capital gains. This order was upheld in appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and also later by the Tribunal following in this behalf the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat in CIT v. Kartikey V. Sarabhai [1981] 131 ITR 42. This is what led to the following question referred for the opinion of this court : "Whether the Tribunal was right in law in holding that a transfer of capit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... king over his personal asset to the partnership firm, as his contribution to its capital, cannot fall within the terms of section 48 and as that provision is fundamental to the computation machinery incorporated in the scheme relating to the determination of charge provided in section 45, such a case must be regarded as falling outside the scope of capital gains taxation altogether. In holding so, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd whether any capital gain accrued to the partner which was subject to levy of income-tax ?" The answer to this question has, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Kartikey V. Sarabhai's case [1985] 156 ITR 509, to be that the Tribunal was right in holding that the handing over of the capital asset to the firm amounted to a transfer, but no capital gains liable to income-tax accrued t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
