9911796707
TMI Blog1976 (8) TMI 180X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondents 1 and 2. JUDGMENT Khanna, This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Mysore High Court whereby the High Court dismissed petition under articles 226 and 227 filed by the appellants to challenge the order dated September 12, 1967 of the Mysore Revenue Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter re ferred to as the Tribunal). The brief facts giving rise to this appeal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5, 1962 accepted the revision petition and held that the appellants were not strangers to the watan. In arriving as this conclusion, the Tribunal held disagreeing with the Assistant Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner that the watan had been acquired by BasangoudaI. The respondents challenged the order of the Tribunal by means of a writ petition. The Writ petition filed by the respondents was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ua the lands in dispute. The Tribunal accordingly dismissed the revision petition which had been filed by the appellants. The appellants thereafter filed petition under articles 226 and 227 before the High Court and assailed the above order of the Tribunal. The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the finding that the appellants were strangers to the watan was one of fact and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er 13, 1964 recorded a finding and gave direc tions to the Tribunal not to reopen the questions of fact in revision. The Tribunal while passing the order dated September 12, 1967 complied with those directions of the High Court. The appellants are bound by the judgment of the High Court and it is not open to them to go behind that judgment in this appeal. No appeal wag filed against that judgment ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
