9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (6) TMI 725X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ided in the case of SRI. EMANI VENKATAPHANINDRA SATYA KRISHNA VERSUS THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS [ 2019 (7) TMI 1686 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT ] where it was held that as the impugned orders in present writ petitions disqualifying the petitioners as Directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Act, have been passed considering the period prior to 01.04.2014, the same cannot be sustained, and are li ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s of the above referred common order. 4. Sri. N. Rajeshwar Rao, the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondents, has fairly conceded that the common order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P. No. 5422 of 2018 and batch, dated 18.07.2019, covers the lis in question. 5. A reading of the common order, dated 18.07.2019, passed in W.P. No. 5422 of 2018 and batch, re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... deactivation of their DINs, are set aside, and the 2nd respondent is directed to activate the DINs of the petitioners, enabling them to function as Directors other than in strike off companies. 32. It is made clear that this order will not preclude the 2nd respondent from taking appropriate action in accordance with law for violations as envisaged under Section 164(2) of the Act, giving the said ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
