2018 (5) TMI 2032

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent. JUDGMENT Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioners be kept on record. The subject matter of challenge in the present writ petition is a list published by the Registrar of the companies naming the directors of the companies who have attracted disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 (in short, the said Act of 2013). Mr. Talukdar, learned senior counsel appea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... year 2013-14 and not for any period prior thereto and as such, the direction to disqualify the petitioners with effect from the financial years 2013-14 is not sustainable. In support of his arguments, Mr. Talukdar has placed reliance upon a judgment delivered in the case of Arun Seth vs. Union of India, reported in 2017 SCC OnLine Cal 17624 (disposed of on 15.11.2017). Per contra, Mr. Prasad, lea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dent no.1 so far as it pertains to the petitioners herein. There shall be a further interim order allowing the petitioners to continue as directors in all the companies in which the petitioners have been serving as directors and to comply with the formalities as provided under the Companies Act, 2013. The said interim orders shall continue till the end of August, 2018 or until further orders whi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X