TMI Blog2016 (2) TMI 1292X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... admitted the Central Excise Appeal No. 18 of 2016 filed by DHL Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. against the CESTAT Final Order Nos. A/3572-3573/2015-WZB/STB, dated 30-10-2015 as reported in (Tri.-Mumbai) (DHL Express (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner). While admitting the appeal, the High Court passed the following order : "1. Having heard both sides and perusing the order passed by the Tribunal, we ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... right in upholding imposition of penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act?" 2. Mr. Jetly waives service for Revenue." The Appellate Tribunal in its impugned order had held that the appellant's activity of 'door to door' transportation of time-sensitive documents, goods or articles utilizing services of a person was covered under Courier Services. Their contention that they wer ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|