Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (8) TMI 1637

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... if the prosecution is taken to be for the purposes of retribution, sufficient penalty has been imposed upon the petitioners, which, on litigation also, has remained inviolate and the same has been paid. The tax liability also is stated to have been paid, which statement has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the Income Tax Department. In fact, it has been admitted in the counter affidavit that a No Dues Certificate has been given to the petitioners by the Department. Without going into the merits of the complaint with respect to the complaint being silent about the specific role played by the petitioners and the inference of culpable mental state of the petitioners in their capacity as partners of the firm, this Court, taking int .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax. 2. The petitioners seek quashing of the entire prosecution arising out of Complaint Case No. 247-C of 2008 and particularly the order dated 25.07.2008 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Special Court, Economic Offences, Patna, whereby cognizance has been taken against them for the offences under Sections 276C, 277 and 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. From the perusal of the complaint, it appears that with respect to the Assessment Year 1994-95 (Financial Year 1993-94), lesser tax liability was shown by the petitioners and, therefore, a prosecution has been launched against them by the Income Tax Department. 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners, withou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fine or tax liability. The punishment is to prevent any further false disclosure in the circumstance when self-certification is the basis for fixing tax liability. In such a situation even the delay in concluding the prosecution should not come to the avail of the petitioners and the case be allowed to be proceeded further. 7. It has further been submitted by Mr. Sinha, learned Advocate, that in a summons case which is tried in accordance with the provisions contained in Chapter-XX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Cr.P.C.), there is no provision for discharge at any early stage and after the substance of the accusation is stated to the accused persons, it is open for them to plead guilty. In that event, a conviction is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... purposes of retribution, sufficient penalty has been imposed upon the petitioners, which, on litigation also, has remained inviolate and the same has been paid. The tax liability also is stated to have been paid, which statement has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the Income Tax Department. In fact, it has been admitted in the counter affidavit that a "No Dues Certificate" has been given to the petitioners by the Department. 10. Without going into the merits of the complaint with respect to the complaint being silent about the specific role played by the petitioners and the inference of culpable mental state of the petitioners in their capacity as partners of the firm, this Court, taking into account the year in which the offe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nds of justice require that the proceeding ought to be quashed. Such inherent powers are necessarily to be exercised when no useful purpose appears to be served by continuing with such prosecution. 13. The offences against the petitioners are pertaining to wrong disclosure with respect to their income. Though criminal prosecution has been provided for in the Act; nonetheless the elements of the offence veer around civil liability/liability attracting penalty of tax. Under such circumstance, when the petitioners have been paying income tax on an yearly basis and have not been prosecuted for any false disclosure either earlier to this prosecution or thereafter, it would only be in the nature of harassment to the petitioners if this case is a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates