1988 (4) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng that case we had observed that the property of the firm should be proceeded against by the Department. It has been contended before us in this writ petition that the petitioner in this petition has a share in the property, being a member of an undivided Hindu family. The present petitioner was not a party to the earlier writ petition decided by us on August 25, 1987. It has also been brough .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X