9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 1595X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... D THAT:- Counsel for the applicant has referred to the letter of rejection wherein it is clearly brought out by the liquidator that balance amount of ₹ 16,18,118 is due and payable to the applicant but for certain reasons best known to the liquidator the claim was rejected with the request to the appellants/applicant to approach appropriate authority for the claim of rest of the amount again ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... jected. In terms of the above, the application is allowed. Application disposed off. - I. B. No. 1451 (ND) 2019 - - - Dated:- 29-11-2019 - CH. MOHD. SHARIEF TARIQ Judicial Member and K. K. VOHRA Technical Member Anil Koushik and Uttam Datt for the petitioner. Ranya Gayathri for the voluntary liquidator. Mayank Bughani and Arushi Sralech for the objector-Tata Projects Ltd. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ues were pending with the respondent-company, a claim of ₹ 16,18,118 could not be submitted due to which it could not form part of the declaration. Counsel for the applicant has referred to the letter of rejection wherein it is clearly brought out by the liquidator that balance amount of ₹ 16,18,118 is due and payable to the applicant but for certain reasons best known to the liquidato ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ainst the decisions of the liquidator. The submissions made by counsel for the applicant are plausible. The objection raised by counsel for the liquidator is devoid of merits and stands rejected. In terms of the above, the application is allowed. The liquidator is directed to admit the claim of the appellant/applicant as per form B, which has already been filed by the applicant. The compliance wil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
