9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (3) TMI 639X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , and Mr. Karan Sachdev, Advocates. Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Amrit Singh and Mr. Adarsh K. Gupta, Advocates for R1. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. O R D E R [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] CM APPL. 9934/2021 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3254/2021 and CM APPL. 9933/2021 2. We are infor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ohatgi and Mr. Lakshmikumaran, the DGAP has not made requisite adjustment in those instances where the selling price was found to be lower than the average base price. 3.4. They contend, had the adjustment been made, then, the petitioner would have been able demonstrate that it had, as a matter of fact, transferred benefit amounting to approximately Rs. 61 crores to its consumers. 3.5 On the oth ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng today, should be maintained for the reason that a coordinate Bench, vide aforementioned order, i.e., order dated 18.02.2020, has taken a similar view, albeit, at the interim stage. It is ordered accordingly. 5. Accordingly, list the matter on 29.04.2021. 6. In the meanwhile, the respondents will have liberty to file a counter-affidavit and a reply to the interlocutory application within the n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
