9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 428X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - HELD THAT:- In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AND ANOTHER VERSUS M/S. KANAK EXPORTS AND ANOTHER [ 2015 (11) TMI 80 - SUPREME COURT] , the appeal is disposed of on same terms holding that Notification No. 48/2005 dated February 20, 2006 and Notification No. 8/2006 dated June 12, 2006 cannot be applied retrospectively and they would be effective onl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ence. 2. The appellant has assailed the order dated 29thSeptember 2005 passed by the learned single Judge in this appeal. The appellant had filed a writ petition before the learned single Judge in which Notification dated 21stApril 2004 to the extent it is applicable to the appellant was challenged. The learned single Judge by the aforesaid order, dismissed the writ petition. Accordingly, this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... disposed of on same terms. The Order dated 29th September 2005 passed by the learned single Judge is set aside and the Writ Appeal is disposed of in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AND ANOTHER supra. Needless to state that the appellant shall be entitled to take steps to avail of the benefit of Trade Notice dated 7/2018 dated 8th May 2017. It is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
