9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 1031X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. VERSUS M/S MOHIT MINERALS PVT. LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR [ 2021 (1) TMI 647 - SC ORDER] , the Opposite Parties will not require the Petitioners before this Court hereafter to pay IGST on ocean freight until further orders. These writ petitions are adjourned sine die with liberty to the parties to mention them for listing after disposal of the SLPs pending before the Supreme ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SLP has stated to be still pending consideration in the Supreme Court. Also it is noticed that no order staying the judgment of the Gujarat High Court in the case of M/s. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India has been granted. As regards the prayer of some of the Petitioners before this Court that they should not be hereafter asked to pay GST on ocean freight. Mr. Chimanka, learned Standi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ies Ltd. Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India reported in 2020 (41) GSTL 292 (Guj.). 5. In that view of the matter, it is clarified that while the question of the Petitioner being entitled to refund will await the final decision of the Supreme Court in the aforementioned SLPs, the Opposite Parties will not require the Petitioners before this Court hereafter to pay IGST on ocean freight until further order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
