9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (5) TMI 362X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt that the impugned order has been passed with pre-set mind. In any event, the order has been passed without considering the reply received from the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner as there is a manifest violation of business of justice while passing the impugned order. Under these circumstances, the impugned order stands quashed a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 021. As per the said notice, the petitioner was required to file a reply on or before the end of the day on 15.03.2021 by 23.59 hours. In other words, the reply of the petitioner was to be filed digitally latest by 11.59 PM in the night. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had also sent a reply before the deadline for filing the reply had expired on 15.03.2021 and therefore ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g the reply received from the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner as there is a manifest violation of business of justice while passing the impugned order. 6. Under these circumstances, the impugned order stands quashed and the case is remitted back to the second respondent to pass a speaking order on merits in accordance with law after ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
