TMI Blog1987 (9) TMI 37X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Construction Co., Malerkotla, have been summoned by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala, vide his order dated July 17, 1984, to face trial under section 276C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This order has been passed in pursuance of a complaint by the Income-tax Officer, Central Circle, Patiala, on the ground that they have wilfully attempted to evade payment of tax by filing false and incorrect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... all that needs to be done is to screen the contents of the impugned complaint to find out if it has been alleged anywhere that the petitioners or any one of them were/was in charge of the affairs of the firm and were/was responsible to it for the conduct of its business. Having perused the same, I find that no allegations worth the name have been made except against petitioner No. 2, i. e., Smt. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner No. 2, and J. M. Singh, non-petitioner, nor can the proceedings be continued against them. Therefore, the impugned complaint and the resultant proceedings which are now pending in the Court of the Chief judicial Magistrate, Patiala, against the accused except the firm, petitioner No. 2, Smt. Santosh Ahluwalia, and J. M. Singh, non-petitioner, are quashed.
X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|