9911796707
TMI Blog1995 (1) TMI 416X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , Adv. ORDER 1. This appeal by Special Leave arises from the Judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 21.2.1985 made in L.P.A. No. 26 of 1985 dismissing the appeal in limine as barred by limitation. 2. The respondent filed the Writ Petition which came up before the learned Single Judge claiming alternative site on the ground that his land has been acquired for public purpose and that the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... opportunities to the respondent on 1.12.1981 and 8.3.1982 to produce the record to show that he was the owner as on the date of the Notification, he had not produced the record. In paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent as well as in the grounds it was stated that it is irrelevant when the respondent purchased the notified land or not. The relevant question is that when the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... entitled to claim compensation by virtue of sale made in his favour, namely, the right, title and interest the predecessor had but, he cannot be said to be the owner for allotment since the right of ownership would be determined with reference to the date on which Notification under Section 4(1) was published. This was the view of this Court in another case while considering the Full Bench Judgmen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
