9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (5) TMI 766X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ke final decision qua departmental proceedings initiated against the respondent no.1 - original applicant without delay and to complete the entire exercise before 31.03.2019. 2. The respondent no.1 was posted as Superintendent of Customs, Division - Valsad, Customs Commissionerate, Ahmedabad. He attended the age of superannuation on 31.05.2019. 2.1. He was booked along with two other officers by the Anti Corruption Bureau to the alleged demand of bribe. A Criminal Prosecution No. 04 of 2007 was filed against all of them and the Sessions Court acquitted all the three on 28.05.2012. An appeal came to be preferred before this Court being Criminal Appeal No. 1344 of 2012 which is pending till date. 2.2. A Regular Departmental Proceedings for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appeal before the High Court. 2.6. The respondent - employee had preferred Original Application No. 370 of 2016 before the Central Administrative Tribunal which directed the respondents to take final decision qua departmental proceedings without delay and to complete the exercise before 31.03.2019 which has aggrieved the petitioner who is before this Court with the following prayers: - "(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit and allow this petition. (B) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside impugned order dated 17.12.2018 (Annexure-A) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es against S/Shri K.S.Vasudevan, then Inspector (Retd), Rohitashwa Meena, Supdt & Sunil Kr. Verma, Inspector in his 2nd stage advice. 3. A Common inquiry proceedings have been held in this case w.r.t. all three Charged Officers under Rule 18 of the CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 and one of the officer viz. Shri K S Vasudevan, then Inspector has since been retired. The Disciplinary Authority in respect of Shri K S Vasudevan, then Inspector (Retd) as per proceedings under Rule 9 of the of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1965 is Hon'ble President of India. As per Rule 18(1) of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965, the senior most Disciplinary Authority is the Disciplinary Authority in case of common proceedings involving more than one officer. Therefore, the Hon'ble Pre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
