9911796707
TMI Blog1986 (11) TMI 26X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t "), has assailed the decision (annexure-4) of the Commissioner of Income-tax (opposite party No. 1) and has prayed for quashing the same by issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari and to issue such other writ as the Circumstances would demand. The petitioner is a partnership firm. It applied on June 29, 1976, for registration of the firm which was required to be filed on or before March 31 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat an application for registration which is refused on the ground of delay in exercise of the power under section 184(4) is not appealable. The decision has been reported as New Orissa Traders v. CIT [1977] 107 ITR 553 (Orissa). Following the aforesaid decision, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the second appeal as not maintainable. Realising the mistake, the assessee preferred an application for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ple of section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and would have entertained the revision application to consider the correctness of the order of the assessing officer on its own merits. Approach to authorities having no jurisdiction, in good faith, should have been considered as sufficient cause for delayed application. The very fact that a revision was filed against the order of the Appellate, Tr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
