2021 (6) TMI 821

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and likewise in respect of AY 2004-2005, the petitioner is entitled to refund of ₹ 7,94,89,178. As against this, we are told, that the demand for AY 2005-2006 is approximately ₹ 2.02 crores. The assessing officer should have made the adjustment, and passed an appropriate order, in that behalf. Since this suggestion has not been accepted, the captioned application is disposed of, wi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - W.P.(C) 5090/2021 And CM No. 16895/2021 - - - Dated:- 3-6-2021 - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Petitioner: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Mr. Rohit Garg Ms. Disha Jham, Advs. Respondents: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Sr. Standing counsel for Revenue. ORDER CM No. 16896/2021 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No. 16895/2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... told, that the demand for AY 2005-2006 is approximately ₹ 2.02 crores. 3. Ideally, the assessing officer should have made the adjustment, and passed an appropriate order, in that behalf. Since this suggestion has not been accepted, the captioned application is disposed of, with the following directions: (i) The concerned officer will ensure that the amount payable on account of refund .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X