9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 1389X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the first bail application of the applicant it appears that the ground which has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant in the second bail application has already been considered by learned Single Judge of this Court and simply because the reference has not been made in the order rejecting the bail application cannot be said to be a new ground for the present second bail application. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt. The new ground argued by learned counsel for the applicant is that a complaint has been filed against the applicant in the year 2015 and the offence which is said to have been scheduled offence, was committed in the year 2004 till 2006. During the said period, the schedule of the offence as mentioned in the Act of PMLA 2002 was effective between 2005 to 2009 and did not contain Section 120- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e case of M/s Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd Vs. Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India, Bangalore and another decided on 13.3.2017 passed in writ petition no.5962 of 2016. The applicant is in jail since 15.1.2016. Learned counsel for the Union of India has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the said ground was already available to the applicant who has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cation. Hence without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the submissions advanced, we find that no new ground is made out for enlarging the applicant on bail. The bail application of the applicant Radhey Shyam Dubey, involved in Complaint Case No.1 of 2015 arising out of ECIR/22/PMLA/LZO/2012 (old no. ECIR/296/DZ/2009 AD (SK) u/s 3/4 Prevention of Money Laundering ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
