Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (7) TMI 1012

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gainst the Resolution Professional (RP) of Tantia Constructions Limited (the corporate debtor), seeking direction upon the RP to reconsider and reverify the claim submitted by the applicant on 24.04.2019, which is before approval of the Resolution Plan. 2. Mr. Akhilesh Shrivastava, Ld. Counsel for application IA No. 497/KB/2020 submits as follows:- 2.1. On 24.04.2019, the applicant filed its claim with the RP for a sum of Rs. 1,81,00,496/-. Pages 18 to 73 of the Application The RP vide his email dated 15.05.2019, Page 74 of the Application requested evidence showing that - (i) the corporate debtor has accepted the goods supplied by the applicant, (ii) the ledger statement (iii) details of the cost of material, and (iv) interest calculatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Adjudicating Authority. 2.6. Mr. Akhilesh Shrivastava relied on Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank (2000) 4 SCC 406 for the proposition that in a case of this nature, once the debt is proved, it cannot be reduced by any authority, much less the Resolution Plan. 2.7. The present application has been filed on 03.02.2020 requesting direction on the RP to consider the claim of the Applicant. 3. Reply by Mr. Ratnanko Banerji, Ld. Sr. Counsel appearing for the answering respondent:- 3.1. The answering respondent has filed his reply dated 13.01.2021 to the application, wherein he has stated that the reply is being filed in the capacity of Chairman of the Monitoring Committee since the RP is no longer in office following the approval of the Reso .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... orma invoices from April 2018 to March 2019 have been annexed. 3.7. Moreover, the Resolution Plan of the corporate debtor has been approved by this Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 24.02.2020, Page 14 of the Reply therefore, the present application needs to be rejected as infructuous. Any acceptance at this stage will be completely prejudicial to the other stakeholders. Para 6 at page 4 of the Reply 4. Analysis and findings 4.1. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and learned senior Counsel appearing for the answering respondent and perused the documents. 4.2. The issue of maintainability of the present applications was taken up as a preliminary issue and orders were reserved thereon on 16.03.2021. There .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te and not to adjudicate the matter. 4.6. Mr. Ratnanko Banerji, Ld. Sr. Counsel for the Resolution Professional argued that certain materials which were given on hire by the claimant for being used for the Metro work are still in the possession of Metro Railway and arbitration proceedings between Metro Railway and the corporate debtor represented by the RP are going on. The main contract itself was terminated by the Metro Railway on 26.02.2018. The RP had examined the documents attached with the claimant in Form 'B' and concluded that only 3 (three) invoices for June, July and August 2017, are complete in all respect with signatures. In the case of other dues, either a proforma invoice or tax invoice had not been authenticated by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ture of back to back contract, or in other words, the payment to the applicant is conditional upon payment being received from the principal employer i.e. Metro Railway. While there may be a good ground to argue that Proforma Invoice cannot be a substitute for a proper tax invoice, the RP ought to have factored in at least the basic rent and collated the claim on that basis with a rider that tax component can only be factored in once the proper tax invoice has been raised. This has not been done in the present case. 4.10. The sheer anchor of the defence raised by the answering respondent is that once a Resolution Plan is approved all undecided claims are extinguished. As we have already held in our order dated 09.06.2021, an act of Court c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates